FaithAlone.net

Is the Bible Negative Towards Mothers When They Have a Female Child? (Leviticus 12:1-5)

In Leviticus 12, the procedure for postpartum recovery after childbirth is given:

Leviticus 12:1-5

1 And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying,
2 Speak unto the children of Israel, saying, If a woman have conceived seed, and born a man child: then she shall be unclean seven days; according to the days of the separation for her infirmity shall she be unclean.
3 And in the eighth day the flesh of his foreskin shall be circumcised.
4 And she shall then continue in the blood of her purifying three and thirty days; she shall touch no hallowed thing, nor come into the sanctuary, until the days of her purifying be fulfilled.
5 But if she bear a maid child, then she shall be unclean two weeks, as in her separation: and she shall continue in the blood of her purifying threescore and six days.

If the child was a boy, the total period of uncleanness was 40 days. If the child was a girl, it was 80 days. This has led rabid, psychotic Feminists and Atheists to say that this is somehow disparaging of women, or female children.

However, this is simply the Bible acknowledging that recovery from female births takes longer, on average, than male births. When a woman is pregnant, she partakes of the hormones of the baby, and because the female baby requires more estrogen - which the mother herself needs to feel normal - it takes longer afterward to recover. So, God gives them this buffer where they don't have to go straight back to work, or straight back to church, etc.

God is giving women a break, and more of a break, if the child is female. How that translates to God "disparaging women" is a quandary that only the mind of a God-hating Atheist could ever understand.

It's further important to recognize that this is also about sanitation, as is almost always the case when the Law discusses becoming "unclean". People want to deny that these prescriptions are about sanitation, because they don't want to admit that the Bible was thousands of years ahead of its time, with similar practices only becoming common in the last few hundred years.

That's not to say there was no spiritual significance whatsoever in any of the Law's cleanliness rules, but a major element of them is just being physically clean and sanitary.

Conclusion

It's understandable why Feminists who abort their children, or have just a few children in their lives, miss the significance of this passage, and how it protects mothers. So, they interpret something that was intended to protect and help women into something negative towards women - which is a frequent error of theirs, expanding to all aspects of gender complimentarianism and the roles that males and females are given in Scripture.